成人午夜激情影院,小视频免费在线观看,国产精品夜夜嗨,欧美日韩精品一区二区在线播放

當前位置:首頁>>軟件教程>>新聞內容  
2003年知識管理領域最具影響力的100家公司
作者:KMWorld 發布時間:2003-11-30 12:53:59 | 【字體:

來源:http://www.kmworld.com/100.cfm

排行榜如下(按字母順序):

80-20
AEA Technologies
Antarctica Systems, Inc.
Applied Semantics
APQC
AskMe
Atomz Corporation
Autonomy
AWD: DST Technologies
BEA Systems
BroadVision
Business Objects
Butterworth-Heinemann
Cadenza
Captiva
Centric Software
Citrix
ClearForest
Cognos
CommerceOne
Computer Associates
Convera
Correlate
Crystal Decisions
Computer Sciences Corporation
Current Analysis
Dialog
Documentum
eManage
Endeca
Endymion
Enfish
Entopia
Factiva
FatWire Software
FileNET
FluentMedia
Fujitsu Software
Hewlett-Packard
Hoovers
Hummingbird
Hyland Software
Hyperwave
IBM/Lotus
Identitech
iManage
Informatica
Information Builders
Intelligenxia
Intelliseek
Interwoven
Intraspect
Inxight
Kamoon
KM Technologies
Knexa
LexisNexis
Microsoft
Mobius Management Systems
Netegrity
Odyssey Development, Inc.
OneSource
Open Text Corp.
Oracle
PeopleSoft (incorporating J.D.Edwards)
PensEra
Percussion
Plumtree
Primus
Ptech
SAP
Scopeware
Selectica
Semagix
SER Solutions
ServiceWare
Siebel
SiteScape
Softheon
Sopheon
SPSS
Stellent
Stratify
Sun Microsystems
Sybase
Symtrax
Tacit Knowledge Systems
TheBrain
TimeVision
Tower Software
TripleHop
Ultimus
Venetica
Verity
Vignette
Vivisimo
WebMethods
West Group
Xerox
YourAmigo
ZenSar

Consulting Companies
Accenture
Basex
Bearing Point
Cap Gemini Ernst & Young
Delphi Group
Forrester Research
Gartner
IDC
Meta Group
Ovum

 

英文說明:
KMWorld’s 100 Companies that Matter in Knowledge Management 2003

By Hugh McKellar
KMWorld Executive Editor
The Faces of Knowledge Management

t has been a little more than a year since we last published our list, and those 13 months saw far more than their share of turmoil. The tech sector has, well, tanked in many areas. Consolidation and downright business failures gained even greater momentum. Many surviving companies, even some listed here, have been trying to reposition themselves in that ever-moving target of technology. Which brings us to knowledge management. For reasons I have yet to fully understand, KM has always been an elusive-and sometimes even maligned-term. To be sure, there were some magnificent failures of KM initiatives, especially early on, precisely, I think, because far too many people just don’t understand what knowledge management really is-put three analysts, vendors or maybe even editors in a room, and you’ll get 10 different definitions.

Knowledge management is an attitude, not an application, and that’s what we’re celebrating with this list: Acknowledging and discovering an organization’s information assets and maximizing their use and reuse in every conceivable practical way is, simply, sound business. KM is the umbrella under which other disciplines fall, among them business intelligence, collaboration, competitive intelligence, content management, customer (and partner) relationship management, document management, expertise location, portals, unstructured data management workflow and so on. We’ve also recognized a number of consultancies and research firms for their contributions to KM. (Although a number of the companies mentioned in the list offer significant e-learning offerings, other e-learning solution providers will be acknowledged in the November/December issue of KMWorld’s new ’E-Learning World’ section.)

Just as in previous years, the list was conceived as a way to identify some of the organizations leading the way in the knowledge economy. It was compiled informally through discussions with colleagues, analysts, vendors (and their competitors) and has been designed to encourage the broader discussion of knowledge management. Criteria for inclusion varied, but all companies have things in common. Each has either helped to create a market, redefine one or enhance one, and they all share one thing媣elocity of innovation.

When we first published the list in 2000, many of the above-mentioned disciplines were in their relative infancy. XML was barely emerging as a format for describing network services. UDDI (Universal Description, Discovery and Integration) was just entering beta testing, and SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol) was still a pretty slippery term to grasp. Back then, not many people could have foreseen that these technologies would evolve into the Web services that have so elegantly connected legacy applications to fuller functioned successors and added astounding capabilities to other software solutions.

In 2000, the promise of the enterprise information portal seemed unlimited. Dozens of companies were touting their products-some were merely thin Web veneers, but others were substantial offerings. Over the ensuing two years, of course, some portal players started dropping like flies by night, and the once varied landscape became significantly less cluttered. Stronger companies were quick to acquire technology, and before long the portal began to deliver on much of its promise. While the portal market may have matured-though some would argue that the true enterprise information portal has yet to be developed-organizations want to exploit their value to the fullest. That said, portal providers have dramatically extended their offerings, and with the help of Web services, we’ve likely entered into the days of "portal as platform." We’ll see how long they last.

You筶l note quite a number of content management providers on our list, and we’ve heard about content being king for so long that it’s perhaps becoming a tiresome phrase. Not to stretch a metaphor too far, but if it were a chess piece, content is clearly queen-far more powerful and versatile than any sluggish, dim-witted monarch. When you combine full-scale enterprise content management with some of the technologies offered by unstructured data management, the result is a powerful discipline or technology arena that truly and effectively manages knowledge. Some of the consultants and researchers on our list do just that.

I’ll wager that as 2003 progresses, collaboration will step forward in the headline, we’ll certainly cover it in these pages the months ahead. Many of the companies listed below have made significant investments in collaboration suites, and with those come the need to address security, and access rights, and how to actually manage on a human level a truly collaborative enterprise. When you add content management and workflow into the mix, you’ll find an enlightened return to basics, because it’s fair to say that the times of the big new toy are over.

Organizations aren’t now looking to rebuild from the ground up; rather they are demanding to extract the value from existing technology and enhance it with solutions that actually work. That approach aligns precisely with what knowledge management really is-not software, per se, but a sensibility.

Remember, the purpose of the list is to generate interest and discussion about knowledge management tools and services--it’s not an award program. Send your comments to: kmcompanies@kmworld.com.


文章來源:
 放生
 愚愛
 夠愛
 觸電
 白狐
 葬愛
 光榮
 畫心
 火花
 稻香
 小酒窩
 下雨天
 右手邊
 安靜了
 魔杰座
 你不像她
 邊做邊愛
 擦肩而過
 我的答鈴
 懷念過去
 等一分鐘
 放手去愛
 冰河時代
 你的承諾
 自由飛翔
 原諒我一次
 吻的太逼真
 左眼皮跳跳
 做你的愛人
 一定要愛你
 飛向別人的床
 愛上別人的人
 感動天感動地
 心在跳情在燒
 玫瑰花的葬禮
 有沒有人告訴你
 即使知道要見面
 愛上你是一個錯
 最后一次的溫柔
 愛上你是我的錯
 怎么會狠心傷害我
 不是因為寂寞才想
 親愛的那不是愛情
 難道愛一個人有錯
 寂寞的時候說愛我
主站蜘蛛池模板: 镇赉县| 大安市| 城步| 石城县| 长武县| 嵊泗县| 石台县| 龙岩市| 瓦房店市| 华阴市| 邹城市| 扬中市| 苏尼特左旗| 水富县| 寿宁县| 浮梁县| 漳浦县| 宁武县| 松江区| 二连浩特市| 奇台县| 临泉县| 凉城县| 澜沧| 乐安县| 湘潭市| 搜索| 宜昌市| 高台县| 象山县| 锡林郭勒盟| 白玉县| 攀枝花市| 双江| 五家渠市| 托克逊县| 潜江市| 新宾| 贵阳市| 白山市| 河源市|